Oct 8, 2009

Class Post -- Including Questions 1 & 2, as well as Discussion Question

Archival Methodologies:

1. Abandonment features several times in Harriet ‘Hattie’ Wilson’s life. She is abandoned by her mother and apparently by at least one of two husbands. She is left in a different sense by those in her life who die; her father and a child. Hattie’s life is quite tumultuous, as she boards with various people in various cities, even in various states. The radius of her movement however decreases, as she gets older. It seems she settles in the city of Boston, but moves from residency to residency inside it. It seems that around every two years or so after 1847, at least one major thing in Hattie’s living arrangement changes. This paints a picture of quite an unstable life. However it is also possible that documentation is not accurate on the amount of moving she did. It is possible that her life was more or perhaps less chaotic, if documentation was not thorough or correct.
Death and abandonment seem to happen in a somewhat close proximity to one another in Hattie’s life. She is abandoned by her mother two years after the death of her father in 1829. After her husband leaves her, her child dies (as does the removed husband). Even after an apparent split from her second husband (he is not mentioned and her name returns to being recognized as “Wilson”), she eventually dies as well.


2.
A.) Calumny: Purposeful degradation through untruths designed to put down

“How many pure, innocent children not only inherit a wicked heart of their own, claiming life-long scrutiny and restraint, but are heirs also of parental disgrace and calumny, from which only long years of patient endurance in paths of rectitude can disencumber them. “
-- Page 6, paragraph 1

In this instance calumny is used to describe how Mag feels her deceased child would have been looked upon and treated as. She is happy that the child has escaped this fate. She also feels that this would have been its fate based on her own folly. The writer tells us that the child would have been polluted by its mere beginnings.

B.) Spare: an adjective, referring to the state of a person’s body, lean or thin, taught flesh

“Two young men seemed desirous of possessing her. One was a neighbor, Henry Reed, a tall, spare young man, with sandy hair, and blue, sinister eyes. He seemed to appreciate her wants, and watch with interest her improvement or decay. His kindness she received, and by it almost won.”
-- Page 32, first full paragraph

This description of Jane’s first betrothed adds a bit to our perception of him. Henry Reed is not introduced to the writer’s audience in a positive light, however neither is his presentation wholly negative. The definition of spare that I feel applies to this usage of the word may not be the author’s intended. However I feel the application of it fits the somewhat mysterious persona we are introduced to. The almost stingy and somewhat dry description molds our viewpoint of Reed and his pursuit of Jane, giving the reader predisposition to favor her next suitor.




Discussion Question:

The importance of class and race are immediately apparent in "Our Nig" by Harriet E. Wilson. The writing gives its audience a variety of ethnically different people in different societal positions. It is evident that the class and race of the characters influence their views on what happens around them, to them, and to their fellows, especially among those playing the role of 'mother'.

We see two instances of mothers in the first 34 pages of “Our Nig”. We are introduced to Mag Smith first. As a mother she seems to care for her child’s wellbeing. She feels it is better for her first child to die than to bear the scorn she has placed upon it. She shows a similar attitude towards her children with Jim. She wants her children to be cared for but does not approve at first of letting one of them live with the Bellmonts because of Mrs. Bellmont, who she angrily calls a “she-devil” (Wilson, 12). Perhaps maternal instinct is there, although buried beneath a hardened shell made by others. At least, Mag feels relief at knowing that she has not driven her child to run away after the child is lost on a walk with a friend (Wilson 13). It seems that Mag seemingly disregards her children because of the disregard she herself has been given, by her guardians and almost constantly those around her (Wilson 5).

Mrs. Bellmont, the second mother to grace the pages of Wilson’s text is no more of a perfect mother. Although she is in a better situation than Mag, she seems to also have a learned distaste for those she deems below her, namely the mulatto child, of Mag, Frado. Mrs. Bellmont’s relationships with her children differ. She seems to be closest to her daughter Mary, who parrots her beliefs and shares her dislike for Frado. Her other daughter, Jane, an invalid depends upon her but longs to be out from under her sway. Although Jane is soft-spoken and un-willful, she makes her unhappiness with her mother’s decision making known to her father. Despite this, her mother looks upon Jane’s marriage and that of her son, James’ as not a chance for marital bliss, but for material gain. She decides that Jane should marry for the land that a suitor has and is said to have taught her son to require “wealthy parentage” of a wife (Wilson 31).

Both white women, the two contrast in class but come together in affect on progeny. As mothers, both seem inept at caring for their children. Although Mrs. Bellmont’s children are decidedly better off than Mag’s, they seem no more connected to their mother, save Mary. Interestingly, most of the children of both come to dislike their mother’s ways and tend towards different ideas on the classes they are brought up to live in. We can see that the time this book was written in reeked of the clash between old and new thinking, the acceptance of Blacks and their continued dismissal.

3 comments:

  1. Cora’s elucidation of the meaning of calumny was very helpful to me, particularly in the context of the quote that she used. I would like to add to the nature of the calumny that Mag feels her children would have undergone. As Cora said, “ the child would have been polluted by its mere beginnings.” This means that the child would have been hated from the start simply because it was a mulatto child. Mag felt responsible for this, but in this sense she wouldn’t actually be inflicting the insults on to her own children.
    The other part of the quote though is that “innocent children not only inherit a wicked heart of their own, claiming life-long scrutiny and restraint.” At first I thought that this meant that Mag thought that children were inherently evil. This made sense to me because of her later descriptions of how strong willed Frado was. But, because this nature supposedly leads to “life-long scrutiny,” I don’t think that Mag is referring to childhood. Instead, I think that she is referring to the child’s being half black. This description as having “inherit[ed] a wicked heart of their own” is sinister in this context, but is also very telling of the way that blacks are viewed, even from a mother to a child.

    ReplyDelete
  2. When reading Our Nig, I did not think about the mothers in such a sense. Cora, you made excellent points that made me think deeper about the book. The two mothers being very similar yet their lives are completely opposite of each others. Mrs. Bellmont is a white woman who seems to be well off financially but views blacks in such a negative way. Then Mag, a white mother to a mullato child, is very poor and has experiences with the black race. Mag views blacks differently than Mrs. Bellmont, although they are both white mothers. The difference is that Mag had her children with a black man and Mrs. Bellmont has segregated herself from the black race and would rather use their existence as slaves. At that time, it is hard to believe that two individuals which these similarities are very much opposite, their values and their lens to the world are completely different. The two mothers do illustrate the class rank in a new perspective for the reader, that regardless how much alike you are to the person next to you, they may view the world in a completely different light.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I was surprised too. I never thought about the role of mother and two different style mothers, while I was reading the novel. The more I read, the more I forgot about the role of Mag. However, continuously Mrs. Bellmont appeared to whip Frado. She disagreed with her children and her husband for taking Frado in the house and the family starts to seem malfunction. Not just about the mother, I also thought about the role of family. The reason is Frado was without not just her mother but family. She was alone in other family. However, compared to Frado who abandoned by mother, unharmonious family members in the white house seem quite satisfied and peaceful. Even though they fight and yell each other with conflict ideas and different minds, they give us an impression that their fight is not required in the house. They have a house to live and they belong to a precious family. Probably Frado was merely jealous for existence of the family. And she might feel if I were Jane or Mrs. Bellmont, I’ll love and care more each other. The circumstance of Frado looks so different to the family, that I think it makes reader think more about the role of family and abandonment.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.